GistX

SAFE · Sample analysis

YC SAFE: post-money, valuation cap

Post-money SAFE template (valuation cap, no discount). Run perspective: party_a (Company, the SAFE issuer). Source listed on /attribution.

Document type
SAFE
classified with 86% confidence
Perspective
Founder (issuing Company)
Clauses parsed
29
Findings
12
grounding 95%
Parties
not stated
Real engine output. Every report, clause, finding, and chat answer below was produced by running GistX's engine and grounded chat against the source document above. Engine classifications, confidence scores, and any quirks (mis-classification, sparse findings, weak headings) reflect the engine as shipped, not a curated highlight reel.
OnePagerExecutiveComprehensiveClause TableAnnotatedFindingsChat

OnePager — SAFE (Simple Agreement for Future Equity)

Not legal advice. This analysis was generated by IntelLegal, an automated document-review assistant. It summarizes what the document appears to say, highlights terms that are unusual or potentially risky, and notes items a reviewer may want to check. It is not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Verify all findings against the source document before relying on them.

Document type: SAFE (Simple Agreement for Future Equity) | Parties: Investor, Company, Purchaser | Governing law: CERTAIN STATES Perspective: Risk read from Company (the SAFE issuer)'s perspective. | Grounding: 0.95

Top flags

  • 🟠 Broad / uncapped indemnification (high): Indemnity obligations can dwarf contract value; check scope, cap, and which side bears them. Read from Company (the SAFE issuer)'s side, confirm this term is acceptable. (§a)
  • 🔵 Governing law / forum (low): Distant governing law/venue raises dispute cost; confirm it's acceptable. (§f)

Key obligations

  • No explicit obligations extracted.

Bottom line

1 higher-severity item(s) to review; 1 expected clause(s) flagged as possibly missing.

Get early access

Or read another sample.